Sign in Subscribe
Leadership Edge

Polishing the Prison Bars From the Other Side

📰 Gavin Nicholls calls it "polishing the prison bars from the other side." Eleven BIM 2.0 builders and users on what switching platforms actually costs a firm, in time, culture, and money.

Polishing the Prison Bars From the Other Side

If a firm stops running one platform and starts running ten, what happens to twenty years of muscle memory while that shakes out?

💡
Who this episode is for: BIM managers, firm leaders, and anyone who has to defend a software line item, the people who feel the switching cost in their calendar, not just their budget.

Summary

Episode one of The Next AEC Tech Stack ended with a pitch: new tools give architects their day back. Episode two of nine (TRXL 239) asks the harder question, the one that comes right after a firm says yes to a new tool. I put some version of it to eleven voices building, using, and watching the BIM 2.0 stack.

Gavin Nicholls calls the sunk cost a serious blocker and describes his own Revit add-in work as "polishing the prison bars from the other side." Carl Christensen has to answer for why Autodesk, the company that built the industry's center of gravity, is choosing to hold customers' hands through this transition instead of moving faster. Matt Wash and Ariel Cooke-Zamora at Bimbeats bring real adoption data: a firm's AutoCAD-to-Civil 3D migration climbed from thirty to seventy percent, then flatlined, and the people who were going to switch already have.

Campbell Yule lays out the Catch-22 underneath the whole BIM 2.0 pitch, and Clifton Harness at TestFit calls Revit "a masterpiece" and argues that's exactly the problem. Randall Stevens, Jesper Wallgren, Holger Kreienbrink, Marty Rozmanith, and Dimitrie Stefanescu all answer from inside the products they're building, sometimes conceding more than a pitch deck would allow.

This series brought to you by
Graitec

Graitec provides AEC software, training, and expert support to help architects, engineers, and construction teams design, build, and manage projects more effectively.

With support from
AVAIL

AVAIL's content management system (CMS) helps architecture and engineering teams find, manage, and reuse their Revit, AutoCAD, Civil 3D, and other technical content in one place.

💡
Free and paid subscribers are getting the same full newsletter for this series. Normally the full edition of Leadership Edge is a paying-member benefit. For The Next AEC Tech Stack it isn't: all nine editions go out complete to everyone on the list, free accounts included, along with the Field Report that goes with each one. The partners above paid for the series so the industry could actually use it.

If someone forwarded this to you, sign up free and the remaining seven land in your inbox. TRXL+ members also get the ad-free feed, the full back catalog, and all the content that goes back behind the paywall when we return to our regular schedule following this series.
Catch the full episode

What's Inside

  • The sunk cost tax. Gavin Nicholls has spent years building his career and his firm's workflows on Revit, so what does he actually give up switching, and what does he refuse to give up.
  • The plateau nobody predicted. Bimbeats measured a real firm's migration off AutoCAD, and it climbed for eighteen months before it just stopped. What does that flatline actually mean.
  • A Catch-22 with no easy exit. Campbell Yule argues every BIM 2.0 vendor has to survive inside the world of the tool it's supposedly replacing, so what happens to the ones that can't.
  • The masterpiece problem. Clifton Harness says Revit's greatest strength is also why it was never built to do the thing everyone is now asking of it.
  • The 10 percent nobody argues about. Randall Stevens says software is the cheap part of the technology tax, so where does the rest of that spend actually go.

Read next